4 ms·
I feel there's an argument to be made for Amazon having a near-monopoly on online sales and distribution in many countries, even outside America. They've simpl
by pixelpoet 7y ago
I feel there's an argument to be made for Amazon having a near-monopoly on online sales and distribution in many countries, even outside America.
They've simply nailed it and scaled it. In New Zealand a company called TradeMe got there first and successfully fended off Amazon, but that's a minority case.
There are pros (e.g. consumers love it) and cons (e.g. human toll when optimising efficiency without robots) to having Amazon dominate in whatever country, but you can't deny, they get the job done. There isn't really another company competing with them at that level, is there? And that's why I think it's an effective monopoly.
To abuse this wide-reaching power, in making your own stuff rise to the top of world sales, is absolutely a concern and we should honestly be grateful that there are laws and funded agencies giving a shit about this.
- toasterlovin 7y agoWe are so early in the shift to online retailing. People using Amazon for stuff other than books, DVDs, and CDs only became a thing in the last 10 years. Walmart has barely started to get their shit together with online retailing. Same for the major supermarket chains. They have an incredible physical presence with huge transaction volume that they can leverage into their online efforts.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- hbosch 7y ago>I feel there's an argument to be made for Amazon having a near-monopoly on online sales and distribution in many countries. Can you share more? This is quite a grand statement to submit based on your "feeling"...