3 ms·

There wouldn't be a difference, but that's not the case here. Workers in the auto sector have several different employers to choose from. In terms of equalizi

There wouldn't be a difference, but that's not the case here. Workers in the auto sector have several different employers to choose from. In terms of equalizing bargaining power, unions make sense in a few narrow contexts -- say, single-employer mining towns -- but far less in cities where workers have many options open to them.

excursionist 7y ago
'Choosing' a union or whether to be part of one is not any harder than 'choosing' an employer.
pytester 7y ago
In terms of equalizing bargaining power, not having unions maybe makes sense if there 3,000 highly competitive companies in the auto sector instead of only three.