7 ms·
Not only is 2% a fairly tepid number, we’ve had to cut rates, make promises to “sustain the expansion”, stop the tapering of The Fed’s balance sheet just to get
by Jorge1o1 7y ago
Not only is 2% a fairly tepid number, we’ve had to cut rates, make promises to “sustain the expansion”, stop the tapering of The Fed’s balance sheet just to get that 2%.
All throughout 2013-2017, the CPI number has hovered either close to 2% or been below it. Keep in mind that the Fed’s goal is symmetric, meaning that to make up for the times when CPI is below 2%, there needs to be other times when CPI is above 2%. It blows my mind that throughout the late 80s and 90s we were hitting anywhere from 3-5% and now we’re struggling to get 2%.