3 ms·
There doesn't seem to be a case for "ultra-advanced", it's more a demonstration on how well you can do without needing "ultra-advanced" technology. Note that t
by caf 7y ago
There doesn't seem to be a case for "ultra-advanced", it's more a demonstration on how well you can do without needing "ultra-advanced" technology.
Note that the INF treaty was bilateral (it only bound its two signatories, Russia and the US).
- credit_guy 7y agoThis paragraph is somewhere in the middle of the article so maybe it's easy to miss: "The TJ100 however not only has much lower thrust than the original KH-55 engine but also is just your regular old turbojet. This leads to some questions about range. Both the missile’s smaller size and its more fuel-hungry engine make it seem unlikely it’s range would be anywhere close to the the Soumar’s/Hoveyzeh’s range of 1350km " So no, the attacks did not happen with the Quds-1 missile, but rather with a much more advanced one. A missile in the same class as the Tomahawk, or the KH-55. These missiles are not garage-level technology.
- caf 7y ago...or it wasn't launched from Northern Yemen.