2 ms·

I'm not really concerned about RMS. I just pointed out that he isn't about "open". To the extent that you're fond of free software and RMS, that's nice, but t

• ZeroMinx 16y ago
  Alright, we're discussing "open" vs "free". Right now I don't care too much about semantics.. For anyone reading this that don't know what we're on about , read --> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.h... (edit: I generally agree with RMS's points. I might confuse "open" and "free". For anyone not native to English these words might be interchangeable. I'm not a native English speaker. It becomes clearer when you define the words such as done in http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.h... , but in a day to day conversation, it's easy to get the exact definitions wrong)
  • Semiapies 16y ago
    "Alright, we're discussing "open" vs "free"." No, we're not discussing one thing vs. another, we're discussing different things. That is a whole other situation entirely.
• ZeroMinx 16y ago
  (yea I realized my distance from the TFA half way through my first post.. but decided to post anyway. (possibly a bad decision). And it has lead to a bit of a discussion. Which is good -- which is what I like)