4 ms·
> having faith in their willingness to contribute to the community I feel like my parents subscribe to this view, that this willingness comes naturally for us.
by Faark 7y ago
> having faith in their willingness to contribute to the community
I feel like my parents subscribe to this view, that this willingness comes naturally for us. It did not. Might have been different a few generations ago, but its easier than ever to live with barely any contact to a community to contribute to. So your paradigm would likely have to "drag along" an increasing number of people.
> free up time
I didn't go with 40 for a reason :) This number has to be adjusted depending on societies ability, just like a minimum wage.
> it risks creating a serf underclass
Valid concern, but probably already reality, just harder to classify and right now less done by the gov. UBI/needs provided would kind of do the same, I think. I also don't see keeping some trade aspect making class mobility harder than what we currently have right now.
- JulianMorrison 7y agoI think the primary reason people lose their willingness to contribute is living in a situation that is both "unending famine" (from their perspective, not GDP) and "rivalrous" as opposed to "cooperative". Such a situation engenders sharp elbows and hoarding. But it reverses itself soon enough when either the "famine" ends or when cooperation is rewarded rather than stepped upon.