At this point we're agreeing about everything except "could" vs "couldn't" You wrote "I don't see why a ... SVG interpreter could solve the halting problem usi

At this point we're agreeing about everything except "could" vs "couldn't" You wrote "I don't see why a ... SVG interpreter could solve the halting problem using this..." The "don't" and "could" imply that given this, an svg interpreter could not solve the halting problem, and thus can't give an answer of "yes". I was saying you want either "I don't see why it couldn't" (a double negative to say that it could), or "I think an svg program could (removing the "don't"). I'm being incredibly pedantic here, yes. I think we're both on the same page, and you just flipped your thoughts from a double negative sentence to a single positive thought, but didn't fixup the part you had already written.