7 ms·

Show HN: I built an online image editor using WebGL and CSS transforms

425 points by rikschennink 7y ago

Gehinnn 7y ago
Nice ;) How come you use WebGL rather than e.g. SVG?
- w56rjrtyu6ru 7y ago
  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think WebGL is the most performant graphics pipeline available in browsers today. I'm hooked on SVG's promise of semantic graphics, but every time I tried building something with SVG in a browser the performance just wasn't there, especially on low-end devices.
  - rikschennink 7y ago
    You're absolutely right, you either go for CSS 3D Transforms, or WebGL, WebGL being faster still.
    - aloer 7y ago
      What’s your take on 2d canvas? I always see these 2d Toole using webgl and wonder how big of a difference it is. Filters of course work best in webgl. But the rest? Also, do you use offscreencanvas in chrome?
      - rikschennink 7y ago
        Every operation is just way faster in WebGL. I currently use WebGL for display preview and 2D canvas for generating the actual image. I suspect you'll run into performance issues if you plan to animate the image in a 2D canvas context (like I do when rotating / flipping / etc.) I've been planning to use offscreencanvas but haven't gotten around to it yet.
- onion2k 7y ago
  Performance.
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Initially I rendered the image preview with CSS 3D transforms, while super fast on Safari, it turned out this wasn't as performant on Chrome when viewing on a retina display (weird right?). So I switched to WebGL, which sits closer (closest?) to the hardware and therefor yields better results. It's now super fast, it can animate filter transitions at 60FPS. SVGs currently don't support hardware acceleration, so that's why I went with CSS transforms for other parts of the UI. The only things rendered with SVG at the moment are the markup, the UI icons, and the rotation control.
sharma_pradeep 7y ago
Great work. Checked out your other products, they are cool as well.
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Thanks!
tomashubelbauer 7y ago
Well done, the app is really smooth even on mobile and I can definitely see it being used for the most common types of image processing. I like the premise of using WebGL and CSS filters. Are you going to open source it? I'd love to see how you implemented that. Edit: Never mind, I just realized this showcases Doka, a commercial component for image processing on the client so that you don't need to do the image processing in the server. Neat product as well.
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Thanks! And indeed, it's a full feature instance of Doka, I figured it might be useful for some people to do quick image editing and offering it for free feels good. It isn't open source, I do use income from Doka to finance my other open source products (like FilePond).
ybahubali2018 7y ago
Looks great. Excellent work.
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Thank you :-)
janaagaard 7y ago
You forgot to add that it works well on a phone! Amazing work.
- rikschennink 7y ago
  I specifically build it to work well across multiple different contexts :)
sokoloff 7y ago
Very nice. Suggestion: in the aspect ratio constraint picker, change “free” to “unconstrained”, “variable”, or “fully variable” to avoid the confusion with “no charge”.
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Thanks! And excellent idea, added to the todo list.
- mgoetzke 7y ago
  and free is not actually free. i had a very wide image which i chose 16:9 for then back to free and I could not actually move the box back to the original content
  - rikschennink 7y ago
    I think you had to zoom out the image (scale down with scroll wheel or multi-touch), maybe this needs to be more clear.
BilalBudhani 7y ago
This looks great. I'm working on a small experimental project which will allow multiple users to collaborate on an image. I will fiddle around with Doka to see how this can fit in with our use case. Great work!
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Awesome, let me know if you have any questions, just use that chat widget thingy on the product page.
leokennis 7y ago
Nice, and cool name too (I suspect you mean doka = Donkere Kamer = Dark Room?)
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Yes, it's the perfect fit, I have someone else to thank for that as I'm horrible at naming things.
fareesh 7y ago
Looks good. I clicked crop, dragged the handles, then clicked resize, but it zoomed in and the image went underneath the menu. Browser: Brave on Ubuntu
- rikschennink 7y ago
  It'll show the actual output size of the image, I'm not a 100% happy with this yet. The fact that you report it here (as a bug) is a good indicator that it needs to be changed.
daliusd 7y ago
As I'm doing something very similar (but different) for my new product so I definitely checked it out. What I like: * Image orientation (from EXIF) support * I like how intuitive it is * I will absolutely use some minor ideas in my product that I have not considered using. What I dislike: * I have uploaded 10000 x 6672 image (this one https://unsplash.com/photos/2S4FDh3AtGw https://unsplash.com/photos/2S4FDh3AtGw) and I see that you scale it down. My experience shows that both Firefox and Chrome handles such large image without problems. * Delay between action and reaction is too high for my taste. It feels unnecessary sluggish. UPDATE: tested with Chromium and it feels response. Only Firefox is sluggish. * Flip does not center around zoom Anyway, awesome work as I know some pain points you might have experienced :)
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Hi, Thanks for feedback! In my experience loading huge images like those and animating them is way too slow so the preview is limited to 1500x1500 pixels (I'm testing on a MacBook from 2014). I have some ideas to work around that. With the recent switch from CSS transforms to WebGL (for the image preview) I've added some additional options. Good luck with your project!
  - zawerf 7y ago
    I don't work with webgl much but I remember there being a max texture size of around 2048 or 4096 on many devices. Wouldn't you end up needing to tile the texture and stuff?
    - rikschennink 7y ago
      There is a limit on canvas size in most browsers, unfortunately it's rather low on iOS, more than 12 megapixels (4000x3000) will result in empty canvas elements. Indeed progressively loading high res textures or tiling is a solution to this.
- eternalny1 7y ago
  > UPDATE: tested with Chromium and it feels response. Only Firefox is sluggish. If you're feeling up to it you might want to file an issue with Mozilla on this.
danvesma 7y ago
This is lush – great work
HyperTalk2 7y ago
You're trying to charge people money for this? $1999 per year for unrestricted access? You can't be serious? https://pqina.nl/doka/#pricing https://pqina.nl/doka/#pricing
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Nope, not for the online image editor, you can edit as many images as you like.
- deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]
- tomhoward 7y ago
  That charge is for cases where a company with at least 25 developers wants to include this as a component in their own apps. It's a pretty normal and reasonable charge for that kind of scenario, in which the company licensing it would likely be charging/earning vastly more than this from their clients or end-users.
- ceejayoz 7y ago
  There's a charge if you want to use the image editor in your own app. You're buying a library, and if your organization has more than 20 developers working on implementing it $2k is peanuts.
  - jermaustin1 7y ago
    Honestly, if you have a single developer working on an implementation, $2000 isn't that much, so $109 is practically a steal!
tobiaswk 7y ago
Cool! Can't help but to mention photopea; https://www.photopea.com/ https://www.photopea.com/ Pretty impressive stuff made by one guy (it was initially). Basically a viable alternative to photoshop in a browser.
- denisovan 7y ago
  And Picozu - https://www.picozu.com https://www.picozu.com
- nickjj 7y ago
  I started to use Photopea for making thumbnails for my videos and blog posts a few months ago but I wish it were more stable. Sometimes it has network connectivity issues that prevents the app from working -- even if you download the "offline" app. Like 2 days ago I couldn't add text to an image because the font list couldn't be loaded over the network due to the site having connectivity issues (and it doesn't work when offline). I had to resort to using gimp otherwise it would have delayed a video from being published. Of all of the online or offline non-Flash image editors that try to replace Photoshop this one is my favorite. I hope it continues to get more developed. It lacks a lot of things but it's good enough for whipping together basic multi-layer layouts. Little things like being able to auto-center things vertically and horizontally by just dragging things around saves so much time. Also supporting Photoshop style layers for doing outlines and shadows speed things up.
  - IvanK_net 7y ago
    Hi, I am the author of Photopea :) Photopea is used by 120,000 people every. We rarely get reports about the site not loading correctly. We received one in June from a user from Malaysia. After some communication, we noticed that it worked well when he used his mobile data, and did not work only on WiFi, so probably the problem was with ISP. If it happens again, just let us know!
    - skykooler 7y ago
      Hi! Would it be possible to add something like GIMP's "Color to Alpha" filter to Photopea?
mk89 7y ago
It doesn't work in Firefox 69.0 :/ Am I the only one? I select one of the images provided in the webpage and it gets stuck on "Loading image...". Sigh...
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Hey, thanks for reporting, that's very odd, if you're familiar with web development can you check if your browser is throwing any errors?
- OJFord 7y ago
  It sat there maybe 2-3 seconds, but then loaded fine for me.
- djsumdog 7y ago
  Gets stuck for me too on 68.0.2 (64-bit/Linux). Works in Chrome. Looking at the console I get: <SetDimensions>: Failed to create WebGL context: WebGL creation failed: * Refused to create native OpenGL context because of blacklist entry: FEATURE_FAILURE_GLXTEST_FAILED * Exhausted GL driver options. This is my work laptop so I never bothered to setup Mesa/GL correctly .. probably the issue. The app should still do a check and report that WebGL isn't enable to the user.
  - rikschennink 7y ago
    Thanks, I'll look into this. If I understand correctly you do get the "WebGL isn't enabled" message?
zerm778 7y ago
wow so creative
zergione 7y ago
Cool tool. Also I like the animations, improves the experience a lot!
lucasverra 7y ago
i've been looking for an online web tool that allows me to : - paste image 1 from clipboard on canvas - paste image 2 from clipboard on canvas - play with canvas overall size to adjust surface of ima1+ima2 - anotate (text, arrow, square) - maybe some template background colors - copy entire canvas to clipboard or download png today i've came back to native powerpoint on my machine with a template that i have to clean on startup (no blank template possible :() Can you help ? - https://whimsical.com/a https://whimsical.com/a => not quick and dirty enought - https://screenzy.io/ https://screenzy.io/ => do not manage 2 images
- zamadatix 7y ago
  Sounds more like diagramming functionality, have you tried draw.io or alike?
  - lucasverra 7y ago
    i have indeed, but i thing you've hit it in the middle (of the problem). My need is much more like https://screenzy.io/ https://screenzy.io/ than draw.io.
- deft 7y ago
  Yep, looking for the same thing. This is so close that I feel adding image splicing capabilities wouldn't be too hard. Powerpoint is ok but too bulky and hard to get the dimensions you want.
pgt 7y ago
This is cool. Please consider adding a way to increase the size of the artboard and compose images on it. Put differently, let me "uncrop" the image or add margins. Multiple times this week I had to pad height or width to a trimmed image to look good on apps like Instagram, or Tinder, or a Facebook cover page.
MarcScott 7y ago
This is perfect, thank you. I need to crop and annotate images all the time for work. I used to use Skitch when I had a Mac, but since moving over to Linux there seems to be a complete lack of simple tools to do basic editing and markup.
- citilife 7y ago
  I mean, I use gimp...
  - sachdevap 7y ago
    I think his point is slightly different. GIMP is neither basic, nor obvious for simple editing.
gvinter 7y ago
I've really enjoyed watching Rik build this library. Congrats, Rik!
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Thanks :)
bitL 7y ago
Cool! Congrats! Welcome to the club! ;-) BTW, does anyone know if there is a transpiler I could use to write an image processing/geometry algorithm/animation algorithm once and then target whatever output language/platform combo is desired? I really dislike JavaScript, I am way more productive in e.g. C++, but I need to rewrite my algorithms from C++ into Java/Swift/JavaScript/Python/CUDA/Kotlin, depending on a platform I address, and frankly I am getting tired of that. I just want to have a vanilla algorithmic code that is pretty transferable across platforms (desktop/web/iOS/Android) automatically transpiled to another language as I need (with platform-specific stuff done in a custom fashion of course); I don't care about performance optimizations for that (no time for that per platform anyway). WebAssembly is supposed to help but it's still not there yet. Thanks for any advice!
- zawerf 7y ago
  Figma is pretty successful and is written in C++ compiled to webassembly: https://www.figma.com/blog/building-a-professional-design-tool-on-the-web/ https://www.figma.com/blog/building-a-professional-design-to... https://www.figma.com/blog/webassembly-cut-figmas-load-time-by-3x/ https://www.figma.com/blog/webassembly-cut-figmas-load-time-...
- monssoen 7y ago
  Have a look at Haxe. It transpiles to C++, Java, Javascript and Python. https://haxe.org https://haxe.org
brailsafe 7y ago
Absolutely wonderful UI design. Though I'm not sure if there's any contrast controls etc...
deft 7y ago
Really nice and simple, loads quickly unlike competitors and seems more useful for making memes / simple image changes. Please add splicing images together, and freeform drawing.
mfbx9da4 7y ago
Would be cool to make as a PWA so I could use it offline
gwarn 7y ago
NIce job. Tested with Chrome. Excellent performance. Great work.

425 points by rikschennink 7y ago

Gehinnn 7y ago

Nice ;) How come you use WebGL rather than e.g. SVG?

w56rjrtyu6ru 7y ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think WebGL is the most performant graphics pipeline available in browsers today. I'm hooked on SVG's promise of semantic graphics, but every time I tried building something with SVG in a browser the performance just wasn't there, especially on low-end devices.
- rikschennink 7y ago
  You're absolutely right, you either go for CSS 3D Transforms, or WebGL, WebGL being faster still.
  - aloer 7y ago
    What’s your take on 2d canvas? I always see these 2d Toole using webgl and wonder how big of a difference it is. Filters of course work best in webgl. But the rest? Also, do you use offscreencanvas in chrome?
    - rikschennink 7y ago
      Every operation is just way faster in WebGL. I currently use WebGL for display preview and 2D canvas for generating the actual image. I suspect you'll run into performance issues if you plan to animate the image in a 2D canvas context (like I do when rotating / flipping / etc.) I've been planning to use offscreencanvas but haven't gotten around to it yet.
onion2k 7y ago
Performance.
rikschennink 7y ago
Initially I rendered the image preview with CSS 3D transforms, while super fast on Safari, it turned out this wasn't as performant on Chrome when viewing on a retina display (weird right?). So I switched to WebGL, which sits closer (closest?) to the hardware and therefor yields better results. It's now super fast, it can animate filter transitions at 60FPS. SVGs currently don't support hardware acceleration, so that's why I went with CSS transforms for other parts of the UI. The only things rendered with SVG at the moment are the markup, the UI icons, and the rotation control.

sharma_pradeep 7y ago

Great work. Checked out your other products, they are cool as well.

rikschennink 7y ago
Thanks!

tomashubelbauer 7y ago

Well done, the app is really smooth even on mobile and I can definitely see it being used for the most common types of image processing. I like the premise of using WebGL and CSS filters. Are you going to open source it? I'd love to see how you implemented that. Edit: Never mind, I just realized this showcases Doka, a commercial component for image processing on the client so that you don't need to do the image processing in the server. Neat product as well.

rikschennink 7y ago
Thanks! And indeed, it's a full feature instance of Doka, I figured it might be useful for some people to do quick image editing and offering it for free feels good. It isn't open source, I do use income from Doka to finance my other open source products (like FilePond).

ybahubali2018 7y ago

Looks great. Excellent work.

rikschennink 7y ago
Thank you :-)

janaagaard 7y ago

You forgot to add that it works well on a phone! Amazing work.

rikschennink 7y ago
I specifically build it to work well across multiple different contexts :)

sokoloff 7y ago

Very nice. Suggestion: in the aspect ratio constraint picker, change “free” to “unconstrained”, “variable”, or “fully variable” to avoid the confusion with “no charge”.

rikschennink 7y ago
Thanks! And excellent idea, added to the todo list.
mgoetzke 7y ago
and free is not actually free. i had a very wide image which i chose 16:9 for then back to free and I could not actually move the box back to the original content
- rikschennink 7y ago
  I think you had to zoom out the image (scale down with scroll wheel or multi-touch), maybe this needs to be more clear.

BilalBudhani 7y ago

This looks great. I'm working on a small experimental project which will allow multiple users to collaborate on an image. I will fiddle around with Doka to see how this can fit in with our use case. Great work!

rikschennink 7y ago
Awesome, let me know if you have any questions, just use that chat widget thingy on the product page.

leokennis 7y ago

Nice, and cool name too (I suspect you mean doka = Donkere Kamer = Dark Room?)

rikschennink 7y ago
Yes, it's the perfect fit, I have someone else to thank for that as I'm horrible at naming things.

fareesh 7y ago

Looks good. I clicked crop, dragged the handles, then clicked resize, but it zoomed in and the image went underneath the menu. Browser: Brave on Ubuntu

rikschennink 7y ago
It'll show the actual output size of the image, I'm not a 100% happy with this yet. The fact that you report it here (as a bug) is a good indicator that it needs to be changed.

daliusd 7y ago

As I'm doing something very similar (but different) for my new product so I definitely checked it out. What I like: * Image orientation (from EXIF) support * I like how intuitive it is * I will absolutely use some minor ideas in my product that I have not considered using. What I dislike: * I have uploaded 10000 x 6672 image (this one https://unsplash.com/photos/2S4FDh3AtGw https://unsplash.com/photos/2S4FDh3AtGw) and I see that you scale it down. My experience shows that both Firefox and Chrome handles such large image without problems. * Delay between action and reaction is too high for my taste. It feels unnecessary sluggish. UPDATE: tested with Chromium and it feels response. Only Firefox is sluggish. * Flip does not center around zoom Anyway, awesome work as I know some pain points you might have experienced :)

rikschennink 7y ago
Hi, Thanks for feedback! In my experience loading huge images like those and animating them is way too slow so the preview is limited to 1500x1500 pixels (I'm testing on a MacBook from 2014). I have some ideas to work around that. With the recent switch from CSS transforms to WebGL (for the image preview) I've added some additional options. Good luck with your project!
- zawerf 7y ago
  I don't work with webgl much but I remember there being a max texture size of around 2048 or 4096 on many devices. Wouldn't you end up needing to tile the texture and stuff?
  - rikschennink 7y ago
    There is a limit on canvas size in most browsers, unfortunately it's rather low on iOS, more than 12 megapixels (4000x3000) will result in empty canvas elements. Indeed progressively loading high res textures or tiling is a solution to this.
eternalny1 7y ago
> UPDATE: tested with Chromium and it feels response. Only Firefox is sluggish. If you're feeling up to it you might want to file an issue with Mozilla on this.

danvesma 7y ago

This is lush – great work

HyperTalk2 7y ago

You're trying to charge people money for this? $1999 per year for unrestricted access? You can't be serious? https://pqina.nl/doka/#pricing https://pqina.nl/doka/#pricing

rikschennink 7y ago
Nope, not for the online image editor, you can edit as many images as you like.
deleted 7y ago
[deleted]
tomhoward 7y ago
That charge is for cases where a company with at least 25 developers wants to include this as a component in their own apps. It's a pretty normal and reasonable charge for that kind of scenario, in which the company licensing it would likely be charging/earning vastly more than this from their clients or end-users.
ceejayoz 7y ago
There's a charge if you want to use the image editor in your own app. You're buying a library, and if your organization has more than 20 developers working on implementing it $2k is peanuts.
- jermaustin1 7y ago
  Honestly, if you have a single developer working on an implementation, $2000 isn't that much, so $109 is practically a steal!

tobiaswk 7y ago

Cool! Can't help but to mention photopea; https://www.photopea.com/ https://www.photopea.com/ Pretty impressive stuff made by one guy (it was initially). Basically a viable alternative to photoshop in a browser.

denisovan 7y ago
And Picozu - https://www.picozu.com https://www.picozu.com
nickjj 7y ago
I started to use Photopea for making thumbnails for my videos and blog posts a few months ago but I wish it were more stable. Sometimes it has network connectivity issues that prevents the app from working -- even if you download the "offline" app. Like 2 days ago I couldn't add text to an image because the font list couldn't be loaded over the network due to the site having connectivity issues (and it doesn't work when offline). I had to resort to using gimp otherwise it would have delayed a video from being published. Of all of the online or offline non-Flash image editors that try to replace Photoshop this one is my favorite. I hope it continues to get more developed. It lacks a lot of things but it's good enough for whipping together basic multi-layer layouts. Little things like being able to auto-center things vertically and horizontally by just dragging things around saves so much time. Also supporting Photoshop style layers for doing outlines and shadows speed things up.
- IvanK_net 7y ago
  Hi, I am the author of Photopea :) Photopea is used by 120,000 people every. We rarely get reports about the site not loading correctly. We received one in June from a user from Malaysia. After some communication, we noticed that it worked well when he used his mobile data, and did not work only on WiFi, so probably the problem was with ISP. If it happens again, just let us know!
  - skykooler 7y ago
    Hi! Would it be possible to add something like GIMP's "Color to Alpha" filter to Photopea?

mk89 7y ago

It doesn't work in Firefox 69.0 :/ Am I the only one? I select one of the images provided in the webpage and it gets stuck on "Loading image...". Sigh...

rikschennink 7y ago
Hey, thanks for reporting, that's very odd, if you're familiar with web development can you check if your browser is throwing any errors?
OJFord 7y ago
It sat there maybe 2-3 seconds, but then loaded fine for me.
djsumdog 7y ago
Gets stuck for me too on 68.0.2 (64-bit/Linux). Works in Chrome. Looking at the console I get: <SetDimensions>: Failed to create WebGL context: WebGL creation failed: * Refused to create native OpenGL context because of blacklist entry: FEATURE_FAILURE_GLXTEST_FAILED * Exhausted GL driver options. This is my work laptop so I never bothered to setup Mesa/GL correctly .. probably the issue. The app should still do a check and report that WebGL isn't enable to the user.
- rikschennink 7y ago
  Thanks, I'll look into this. If I understand correctly you do get the "WebGL isn't enabled" message?

zerm778 7y ago

wow so creative

zergione 7y ago

Cool tool. Also I like the animations, improves the experience a lot!

lucasverra 7y ago

i've been looking for an online web tool that allows me to : - paste image 1 from clipboard on canvas - paste image 2 from clipboard on canvas - play with canvas overall size to adjust surface of ima1+ima2 - anotate (text, arrow, square) - maybe some template background colors - copy entire canvas to clipboard or download png today i've came back to native powerpoint on my machine with a template that i have to clean on startup (no blank template possible :() Can you help ? - https://whimsical.com/a https://whimsical.com/a => not quick and dirty enought - https://screenzy.io/ https://screenzy.io/ => do not manage 2 images

zamadatix 7y ago
Sounds more like diagramming functionality, have you tried draw.io or alike?
- lucasverra 7y ago
  i have indeed, but i thing you've hit it in the middle (of the problem). My need is much more like https://screenzy.io/ https://screenzy.io/ than draw.io.
deft 7y ago
Yep, looking for the same thing. This is so close that I feel adding image splicing capabilities wouldn't be too hard. Powerpoint is ok but too bulky and hard to get the dimensions you want.

pgt 7y ago

This is cool. Please consider adding a way to increase the size of the artboard and compose images on it. Put differently, let me "uncrop" the image or add margins. Multiple times this week I had to pad height or width to a trimmed image to look good on apps like Instagram, or Tinder, or a Facebook cover page.

MarcScott 7y ago

This is perfect, thank you. I need to crop and annotate images all the time for work. I used to use Skitch when I had a Mac, but since moving over to Linux there seems to be a complete lack of simple tools to do basic editing and markup.

citilife 7y ago
I mean, I use gimp...
- sachdevap 7y ago
  I think his point is slightly different. GIMP is neither basic, nor obvious for simple editing.

gvinter 7y ago

I've really enjoyed watching Rik build this library. Congrats, Rik!

rikschennink 7y ago
Thanks :)

bitL 7y ago

Cool! Congrats! Welcome to the club! ;-) BTW, does anyone know if there is a transpiler I could use to write an image processing/geometry algorithm/animation algorithm once and then target whatever output language/platform combo is desired? I really dislike JavaScript, I am way more productive in e.g. C++, but I need to rewrite my algorithms from C++ into Java/Swift/JavaScript/Python/CUDA/Kotlin, depending on a platform I address, and frankly I am getting tired of that. I just want to have a vanilla algorithmic code that is pretty transferable across platforms (desktop/web/iOS/Android) automatically transpiled to another language as I need (with platform-specific stuff done in a custom fashion of course); I don't care about performance optimizations for that (no time for that per platform anyway). WebAssembly is supposed to help but it's still not there yet. Thanks for any advice!

zawerf 7y ago
Figma is pretty successful and is written in C++ compiled to webassembly: https://www.figma.com/blog/building-a-professional-design-tool-on-the-web/ https://www.figma.com/blog/building-a-professional-design-to... https://www.figma.com/blog/webassembly-cut-figmas-load-time-by-3x/ https://www.figma.com/blog/webassembly-cut-figmas-load-time-...
monssoen 7y ago
Have a look at Haxe. It transpiles to C++, Java, Javascript and Python. https://haxe.org https://haxe.org

brailsafe 7y ago

Absolutely wonderful UI design. Though I'm not sure if there's any contrast controls etc...

deft 7y ago

Really nice and simple, loads quickly unlike competitors and seems more useful for making memes / simple image changes. Please add splicing images together, and freeform drawing.

mfbx9da4 7y ago

Would be cool to make as a PWA so I could use it offline

gwarn 7y ago

NIce job. Tested with Chrome. Excellent performance. Great work.