4 ms·
It’s been said, but this is mistitled - this is not a ‘Ken Burns’ effect, but rather a parallax panning effect with depth. To be honest it’s far more impressive
by lostgame 7y ago
It’s been said, but this is mistitled - this is not a ‘Ken Burns’ effect, but rather a parallax panning effect with depth. To be honest it’s far more impressive than I expected.
- JansjoFromIkea 7y agoYep same here, it misrepresents and understates the actual thing to the point that I wouldn't have even clicked on it if the 3D part of the title didn't confuse me.