Not bad but monocular depth estimation has gotten pretty good all around. I made these similar images with basically no expertise, no manual mapping, just tryin

Not bad but monocular depth estimation has gotten pretty good all around. I made these similar images with basically no expertise, no manual mapping, just trying random single image depth projects from github. I kind of just went with whatever I could get running quickly, didn't even evaulate the quality other than cases where it obviously didn't work. (Sorry for linking a million tweets but I didn't put these on a blog or anything, that's the only place they exist.) Your version does look better though! But I was impressed I could just run random images through depth estimates and get anything cool like this. https://twitter.com/jonathanfly/status/1156799136987013120 https://twitter.com/jonathanfly/status/1156799136987013120 https://twitter.com/jonathanfly/status/1153383325974896646 https://twitter.com/jonathanfly/status/1153383325974896646 https://twitter.com/jonathanfly/status/1154472832249860100 https://twitter.com/jonathanfly/status/1154472832249860100 https://twitter.com/jonathanfly/status/1153120643040337925 https://twitter.com/jonathanfly/status/1153120643040337925 I would love to your method take on some Escher paintings, can you try it for me?