3 ms·
I would like to add that our method estimates the scene in full 3D space. Have a look at the additional results, there are a few results that exemplify this whe
by sniklaus 7y ago
I would like to add that our method estimates the scene in full 3D space. Have a look at the additional results, there are a few results that exemplify this when the geometry is a little more complex: http://sniklaus.com/papers/kenburns-results http://sniklaus.com/papers/kenburns-results
- coldtea 7y agoI'd like add that, naming aside, your algorithm results looks amazing, and you could even have a business (or a successful app) here. I know a few online services that do manual (cutting in photoshop, setting on a 3D plane, etc) still photo to 2.5D parallax, e.g.: https://sundstedt.se/blog/services/2-5d-parallax-3d-effect-animated-photo-video-service/ https://sundstedt.se/blog/services/2-5d-parallax-3d-effect-a... there are Fiverr gigs doing it, and tons of filmmakers (me included when I dabble with that), do it ourselves too (which takes time in Photoshop, Premiere, etc) from time to time (for news, documentaries, and such). In fact I am about to pay a good 100-200 to have 4-5 photos done this way for a project...
- sniklaus 7y agoSince I have done the work while interning at Adobe, I am afraid that I will not be able to commercialize it myself due to patenting. I agree with you that it has great potential, there are still quite a few failure cases though and it is a little hit and miss.