Yeah I found that part the most concerning. Basically RWE don't have any clue why they tripped even more than a month on from the event, and apparently have to

Yeah I found that part the most concerning. Basically RWE don't have any clue why they tripped even more than a month on from the event, and apparently have to wait for their next scheduled outage to make progress? That's not good. There also seem to be multiple faults at once that they don't know anything about. Turbine trip? No clue, could be bad sensors, could have been some actual physical problem in the turbine. Overpressure in the condenser? No clue, could be anything. Second generator tripped? Dunno boss. Implies that don't have enough sensor coverage and are hoping to literally eyeball something wrong when they next open it up. Also implies they can't shut down their own plant to diagnose apparent faults in anything like a reasonable timeframe? Not good. Also worth noting - Newcastle Airport were totally fine on their UPS but demanded to be considered a priority customer anyway, and that request was granted? Why? They clearly don't need to be, they have a working UPS! Honestly I'd be sending this report back for more work if I were the boss guy receiving it. It's not good. Filled with repetition, bad grammar, missing information (why did London Underground shut down, what was this 'internal traction issue') and most seriously it leaves a gaping hole around Little Barford.