5 ms·
“flying a banner of doing no evil, and then they’re perpetrating evil under our noses,” said Abraham J. Briloff Paying the lowest amount of taxes required by l
by fleitz 16y ago
“flying a banner of doing no evil, and then they’re perpetrating evil under our noses,” said Abraham J. Briloff
Paying the lowest amount of taxes required by law is certainly not evil. I wonder how much extra Mr. Briloff sends to the IRS, and I wonder how evil he considers that to be. If the law makers in the various jurisdictions didn't intend the tax code to be used in this way it's certainly in their purview to change it. Since this has not happened one can only assume that GOOG et al are acting in the manner which the law makers intended.
In my opinion persons such as Briloff who derive their income from schools which are largely publicly funded to teach people a trade which is largely only necessary because of the tax code are the people who should be paying extra because of what the tax code provides for them. (eg. their livelihoods)
If Briloff wants people to pay extra taxes perhaps he should encourage the gov't to provide services worth in excess of what they cost. Perhaps Mr. Briloff forgets that governments are instituted amongst men to secure rights and not to redistribute and destroy wealth.
- hackinthebochs 16y ago>Paying the lowest amount of taxes required by law is certainly not evil Lawyering around your "intended" tax rate is no different than (black hat) hacking. It's using the rules of a system to circumvent its intent. It's pretty well accepted that (black hat) hacking is morally wrong. How is one morally wrong and the other not?
- sophacles 16y agoBecause government is always bad, and anything they do can only be for the evil.