3 ms·
Right. Because the current price they're charging is going to be all that they're ever going to charge until the patents expire. Or, you know, what's actually
by jbri 16y ago
Right. Because the current price they're charging is going to be all that they're ever going to charge until the patents expire.
Or, you know, what's actually going to happen is the price being kept low until H.264 is well-entrenched, and then being jacked up when there's no competition.
- anonymous246 16y agoSo you agree that 100k/6.5 million would not unreasonable for the entity which would be charged that amount? The linked article addresses inflation also. The licensors agree to not raise royalties by more than 10% per year. Unless you definition of "jacked up" encompasses 10% rise. I see ideological reasons to support a free standard, but not business ones. YMMV.