I don't doubt that's true, but experimentally, detectible harm has only been demonstrated at 2 ug/dl. In 2014, 4.2% of kids in the U.S. (over 500,000) had leve

I don't doubt that's true, but experimentally, detectible harm has only been demonstrated at 2 ug/dl. In 2014, 4.2% of kids in the U.S. (over 500,000) had levels above 5 ug/dl. I don't mean to say that lead isn't an important thing to reduce, but a few kids with relatively low lead levels in a very small part of one city isn't the story, it's the millions of kids with much higher levels right here in the U.S. The only thing that drives this story is the sensationalism of Notre Dame burning and releasing toxic fumes, not the actual impact on kids.