4 ms·
This is also covered (mostly) by Firefox. In enterprise configurations DOH will be disabled by default, and this should cover most of the cases above. https://
by m45t3r 7y ago
This is also covered (mostly) by Firefox. In enterprise configurations DOH will be disabled by default, and this should cover most of the cases above.
https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2019/09/06/whats-next-in-making-dns-over-https-the-default/ https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2019/09/06/whats-nex...
- zrm 7y agoThat's really the opposite of those cases. If you're using group policy then Mozilla's default doesn't matter very much because you can set it to whatever you want using group policy anyway. Where the default really matters is on the devices where it has to be changed via high friction individualized action, e.g. BYOD. I completely understand why they want to support DoH. And then Firefox users with untrustworthy DNS providers would have a solution to it which is no more complicated than a single checkbox to enable it. But what is really being gained over that, which is worth all the trouble of making it the default even for all the people whose existing DNS providers are no less trustworthy than Cloudflare and far less centralized?
- m45t3r 7y ago> But what is really being gained over that Try to explain for a common person what benefits DOH brings to them, or why their DNS provider is unstrustworthy. > [...] which is worth all the trouble of making it the default even for all the people whose existing DNS providers are no less trustworthy than Cloudflare and far less centralized? A small number of people will actually have those "trouble" that you speak, and for most of them the case is so specific that they probably are power users that can figure out themselves.