29 ms·

> The Houthi spokesman, Yahya Sarea, told al-Masirah TV, which is owned by the Houthi movement and is based in Beirut, that further attacks could be expected in

by aodin 7y ago

> The Houthi spokesman, Yahya Sarea, told al-Masirah TV, which is owned by the Houthi movement and is based in Beirut, that further attacks could be expected in the future. > He said Saturday's attack was one of the biggest operations the Houthi forces had undertaken inside Saudi Arabia and was carried out in "co-operation with the honourable people inside the kingdom". https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-49703143 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-49703143

yyyk 7y ago
Of course they'd take responsibility. That's awfully convenient. But it's not their doing.
- dragonwriter 7y ago
  Does it really matter if it was done by the (Iranian proxy) Houthi rebels with assistance from sympathizers in SA, by Iran with assistance from sympathizers in SA, or by Iran from Iran?
  - yyyk 7y ago
    Well, half the thread here is about the Houthis allegedly defending themselves vs SA. If this is instead a direct Iranian attack on a different state, the story changes. Once we understand better what happened, we'll know if and how to act in response.
    - dragonwriter 7y ago
      > Well, half the thread here is about the Houthis allegedly defending themselves vs SA. If this is instead a direct Iranian attack on a different state, the story changes. Not really; everyone who is paying any attention know that the civil war in Yemen is an Iran vs SA proxy war, and that the Houthi claim of responsibility is equivalent to notice of escalation of that war (with the implication that SA deescalating in Yemen is key to undoing the escalation.) Whether the Houthis are actually operationally involved in the attack is immaterial to its significance.
      - yyyk 7y ago
        My point is that the attack has little to do with Yemen, but has everything to do with Iranian designs. So talking about 'escalation in Yemen war' is meaningless (also, if Iran is the one escalating, maybe they're the ones that should undo it?).
  - jbattle 7y ago
    If it portends civil war in SA, that'd be significant

by aodin 7y ago

yyyk 7y ago

Of course they'd take responsibility. That's awfully convenient. But it's not their doing.

dragonwriter 7y ago
Does it really matter if it was done by the (Iranian proxy) Houthi rebels with assistance from sympathizers in SA, by Iran with assistance from sympathizers in SA, or by Iran from Iran?
- yyyk 7y ago
  Well, half the thread here is about the Houthis allegedly defending themselves vs SA. If this is instead a direct Iranian attack on a different state, the story changes. Once we understand better what happened, we'll know if and how to act in response.
  - dragonwriter 7y ago
    > Well, half the thread here is about the Houthis allegedly defending themselves vs SA. If this is instead a direct Iranian attack on a different state, the story changes. Not really; everyone who is paying any attention know that the civil war in Yemen is an Iran vs SA proxy war, and that the Houthi claim of responsibility is equivalent to notice of escalation of that war (with the implication that SA deescalating in Yemen is key to undoing the escalation.) Whether the Houthis are actually operationally involved in the attack is immaterial to its significance.
    - yyyk 7y ago
      My point is that the attack has little to do with Yemen, but has everything to do with Iranian designs. So talking about 'escalation in Yemen war' is meaningless (also, if Iran is the one escalating, maybe they're the ones that should undo it?).
- jbattle 7y ago
  If it portends civil war in SA, that'd be significant