If they just took the “wait and see” approach and some fraction of the population took it up, they’d find themselves fighting against a group of citizens with v

If they just took the “wait and see” approach and some fraction of the population took it up, they’d find themselves fighting against a group of citizens with vested interests, and the corporations would say “you can’t take this away from these people” much like the gun lobby does in the USA. The real “wait and see” approach is to prevent it get a foot in the door, see what happens elsewhere, and then perhaps repeal the decision in the future.