3 ms·
Because it would be grossly unfair. Very likely illegal too.
by tempguy9999 7y ago
Because it would be grossly unfair. Very likely illegal too.
- pas 7y agoWhy would it be unfair? This is a simple cost-benefit risk management. Of course testing people has some cost (harder to find employees, privacy concerns, bad PR, the actual cost of the testing and management of testing), of course if someone fucks up that has an even bigger cost usually, so preventing fuckup while high seems to have a big positive cost-benefit. Okay, then simply get a threshold and look at the risk involved for each individual role/position and test those that are above.
- tempguy9999 7y agoUnfairness is a purely emotional judgement. I can see it, if you can't that's just how it is. I don't mean that negatively. But fairness comes in under the law, it's formalised as discrimination. That is something companies are rightly keen to avoid.
- pas 7y agoI'm asking for the moral calculation that lead you to say it's unfair to make the lives harder for only those who are above a threshold for certain risks. And also how the law works, what's the legal test to determine fairness?