4 ms·
Sure but the “semi-amusing” part varies a lot from person to person. It pattern matches into old neurons and rewards some people (like me) with much delight. It
by LeonB 7y ago
Sure but the “semi-amusing” part varies a lot from person to person. It pattern matches into old neurons and rewards some people (like me) with much delight. It’s valuable nonsense to me at least.
- DonHopkins 7y agoIt's only a little better than Emacs's m-x dissociated-press. https://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/emacs/html_node/emacs_473.html https://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/emacs/html_node/emacs_47... >It is a mustatement that too much use of Dissociated Press can be a developediment to your real work. Sometimes to the point of outragedy. And keep dissociwords out of your documentation, if you want it to be well userenced and properbose. Have fun. Your buggestions are welcome. https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/DissociatedPress https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/DissociatedPress
- ilikepi 7y agoAgreed. The content on this site provides an endless source of giggling for me. I have tried and failed to explain to my wife why I find it so amusing. The author has a talent for presenting quasi-coherent computer-generated gibberish in a particular way, and like you, I guess I'm just highly attuned to it.