4 ms·
This appears to be the original paper: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b03304 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b03304 There’s a slightly be
by new299 7y ago
This appears to be the original paper:
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b03304 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b03304
There’s a slightly better summary, which at least references the paper, here:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/09/190911193303.htm https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/09/190911193303.h...
- bArray 7y agoThank you, it's really bad not to link the paper in a news piece, 1) for evidence, 2) for further reading and 3) for accreditation for the hard working researchers/institutions. Do you happen to have access to the paper through the pay wall? I'm interested in the data itself, the abstract certainly doesn't match up to "worms fail to thrive [..]", I want to see some numbers. There are enough environmental disasters on the horizon without the need to manufacture more.