5 ms·

We can all help stop this. Everyone can reduce their contribution. I cut out nearly all packaged food, which reduced my garbage to where I empty it less than on

by spodek 7y ago

We can all help stop this. Everyone can reduce their contribution. I cut out nearly all packaged food, which reduced my garbage to where I empty it less than once a year (I'm in month 13 of my current load). I was pleasantly surprised that doing so cost less, reduced food preparation time, increased diversity of food, and led to more social interaction with friends and farmers. For the record, it took a couple years of practice to go from weekly garbage to monthly to yearly. That's just one example. Everyone can reduce some. The more you start, instead of just accepting and throwing your hands up, the easier each next step. The producers will see the trend and stop buying plastic. Of course there are other ways to act: legislation, creating healthier alternatives. The point is: everyone can act starting here and now and they will find joy in it. It may take time, but acting on one's values is rewarding.

xamde 7y ago
I stopped to believe the individuals can vote with their wallets to stop the pollution. We are not enough people who care and there are too many things to consider. We need to fight the system using the mechanisms of the system. If pollution costs money, capitalism will optimize to minimize pollution. It depends on the price. We need politics to change the rules. I would advocate to use your time to make destroying the earth costly.
- maybenotenough 7y ago
  Agreed, having the mental energy to worry about the packaging the food your kids eat is not the norm unfortunately. People have too many terrible things in their life to worry about without taking responsibily for this too. Its great for people to recycle but to me its more like being and early tech adopter, it doesnt really work for the masses yet but the lessons learned are invaluable.
mattkrause 7y ago
How do you get ingredients? We cook a lot, but everything besides flour and sugar seems to come in some sort of plastic or metal container.
- spodek 7y ago
  Mostly from my CSAs and food coop. I wrote about them in my blog. http://joshuaspodek.com/where-to-buy-the-best-food-around-new-york-city http://joshuaspodek.com/where-to-buy-the-best-food-around-ne... I bring bags with me.
ctrl-j 7y ago
I worked in a grocery store for 5 years in the produce department and we sold a loooot of unpackaged food to customers that came to us in a lot of packaging. From stabilizers to keep produce from jostling and bruising - all the way to the shrinkwrap the pallets came in with... I dumped a lot of plastic into the trash compactor. I dumped a ton of styrofoam into the trash compactor. Sure, it might show a desire to the producers of food if we shop better - but I doubt your food is as plastic-free as you imagine. And I tossed more plastic daily than the average household did in months. The supply chain needs to be plastic free before we stop having a problem.
- Buttons840 7y ago
  This is a very important point. It makes me think of a smaller scale example I witnessed as a cashier. I saw cashiers throwing away plastic bags by the hundred regularly, because they failed to load them onto the holding racks (you've seen them, but probably paid little attention to them) properly and it was simply easier to toss dozens of bags in the trash and load a full package of bags. Meanwhile, at home my mom rebuked me for throwing one used and damaged bag in the trash instead of recycling. I feel like we all can help with rising sea levels by filling a jar with sea water and keeping it in our house. That's a little less water in the seas. I'm helping. Instead of hoping 7 billion people change their habits, we should change the habits of a few hundred companies. Everyone will pay the price somehow, but companies are vehicles of large scale change, and our markets can efficiently make the changes if we shape them correctly.
  - primroot 7y ago
    Kevin Anderson often stresses out this point. Besides there is this point regarding recycling: “It was propaganda that did not appear propagandistic. It also shielded corporate polluters from blame by shifting responsibility onto individuals.” https://theintercept.com/2019/07/20/plastics-industry-plastic-recycling/ https://theintercept.com/2019/07/20/plastics-industry-plasti...
- zzzeek 7y ago
  agree, I'm pretty frustrated with the notion that end-consumers are entirely responsible for somehow reversing the trend of pollution by voluntarily opting out of the packaging system. Firstly, it is mostly impossible to do completely without enormous effort and sacrifice, secondly, only a tiny fraction of the population is actually going to attempt to do such a thing, and thirdly, as you said, manufacturers and industry will continue to produce and discard the majority of waste in any case. From a political point of view, putting the blame all on consumers is the perfect story for polluting industries to hide behind - "it's all your fault!". It's a scam, and only legislation and interruption at the supply chain will have any impact. The only genuinely good thing about consumers engaging in voluntary source reduction is that they raise their own political awareness, since the main thing they need to do is vote.
Joakal 7y ago
Speak to a supermarket owner/manager. You would not believe how much packaging exists for a simple apple or similar. You would see an unpackaged apple at the end of the process and be none the less aware about the plastics involved. Make sellers take back waste as a condition to sell. Boom. Problem solved.
- salawat 7y ago
  Careful! You've changed the incentive, but doubled the potential number of material transports needed to move packaging back to the source. In the interim period, while businesses figure out how to deal with less packaging, you end up with all the current stuff going back and forth all over the country, or you end up with attempts to set up a shadow infrastructure designed to ensure the right amount of packaging is in the right place at the right time to optimize on minimization of cost of the end product which is now priced with material handling in the equation. Instead of actually changing things the way you hoped, you may just reorganize the supply chain to a slightly more distributed model where packaging doesn't happen until the latest stage in the process. You've also invoked change in regulatory framework. Do we end up having to get FDA approval on alternate forms of food packaging or plasticless food transportation systems? Do the details of the implementation threaten some national security metric with regards to food availability? I'm mot saying I disagree with the intent at all, mind, but broad strokes without focusing on the nagging details have a way of coming back to haunt one in the long run. There are a lot of metrics and analysis that would need to be done before just declaring one day "Thou shalt!" Which is probably no less than what will be needed sadly.
  - ericd 7y ago
    Well, presumably the truck needs to go back to the source, so they can bring back the old packaging on the return trip from bringing new goods to the store? I really wish Amazon would pay their delivery drivers to do this with used Amazon boxes, too.
    - salawat 7y ago
      Not necessarily. Truckers will often pick up entire new loads and chain deliveries depending on whether they're last mile/long haul/commodity/or specialized equipment haulers. So your packaging job would likely just be another blip on another trucker's route. But it would increase the need for more truckers since you're essentially (worst-case) doubling the number of deliveries to be done per transaction.
gbrown 7y ago
Sure, everyone should do their part. BUT: 1. Pretending that's a practical way to get the kind and scale of change we need is extremely wishful thinking, to the point that I wouldn't be shocked to see polluting industries promoting it to distract from regulatory solutions. 2. That attitude reflects your economic privilege. Not only is it harder for poor people to make these kinds of choices, living with a scarcity mindset makes you less likely to care and less able to act strategically. There must be collective action - must.
deleted 7y ago
[deleted]
deleted 7y ago
[deleted]
stjohnswarts 7y ago
You don't give any context for what "a load" is to you? 1 garbage bag? A pickup truck? a regular garbage truck?
anigbrowl 7y ago
Give me a break. I have been leading a low pollution lifestyle for decades and many consumers do too. Nobody likes waste except the people that make money from producing it. I am not throwing my hands up, I am saying it's time to attack the root of the problem instead of clipping the topiary into slightly better shape. Waiting for the market to just catch up is failing and discounts the influence of marketers and lobbyists, as well as discounting the possibility of collective action. Don't be a judas goat.
ericd 7y ago
From some of the other comments, sounds like we also need to throw away all our polyester fabric and stop using cars, as well.

by spodek 7y ago

xamde 7y ago

I stopped to believe the individuals can vote with their wallets to stop the pollution. We are not enough people who care and there are too many things to consider. We need to fight the system using the mechanisms of the system. If pollution costs money, capitalism will optimize to minimize pollution. It depends on the price. We need politics to change the rules. I would advocate to use your time to make destroying the earth costly.

maybenotenough 7y ago
Agreed, having the mental energy to worry about the packaging the food your kids eat is not the norm unfortunately. People have too many terrible things in their life to worry about without taking responsibily for this too. Its great for people to recycle but to me its more like being and early tech adopter, it doesnt really work for the masses yet but the lessons learned are invaluable.

mattkrause 7y ago

How do you get ingredients? We cook a lot, but everything besides flour and sugar seems to come in some sort of plastic or metal container.

spodek 7y ago
Mostly from my CSAs and food coop. I wrote about them in my blog. http://joshuaspodek.com/where-to-buy-the-best-food-around-new-york-city http://joshuaspodek.com/where-to-buy-the-best-food-around-ne... I bring bags with me.

ctrl-j 7y ago

I worked in a grocery store for 5 years in the produce department and we sold a loooot of unpackaged food to customers that came to us in a lot of packaging. From stabilizers to keep produce from jostling and bruising - all the way to the shrinkwrap the pallets came in with... I dumped a lot of plastic into the trash compactor. I dumped a ton of styrofoam into the trash compactor. Sure, it might show a desire to the producers of food if we shop better - but I doubt your food is as plastic-free as you imagine. And I tossed more plastic daily than the average household did in months. The supply chain needs to be plastic free before we stop having a problem.

Buttons840 7y ago
This is a very important point. It makes me think of a smaller scale example I witnessed as a cashier. I saw cashiers throwing away plastic bags by the hundred regularly, because they failed to load them onto the holding racks (you've seen them, but probably paid little attention to them) properly and it was simply easier to toss dozens of bags in the trash and load a full package of bags. Meanwhile, at home my mom rebuked me for throwing one used and damaged bag in the trash instead of recycling. I feel like we all can help with rising sea levels by filling a jar with sea water and keeping it in our house. That's a little less water in the seas. I'm helping. Instead of hoping 7 billion people change their habits, we should change the habits of a few hundred companies. Everyone will pay the price somehow, but companies are vehicles of large scale change, and our markets can efficiently make the changes if we shape them correctly.
- primroot 7y ago
  Kevin Anderson often stresses out this point. Besides there is this point regarding recycling: “It was propaganda that did not appear propagandistic. It also shielded corporate polluters from blame by shifting responsibility onto individuals.” https://theintercept.com/2019/07/20/plastics-industry-plastic-recycling/ https://theintercept.com/2019/07/20/plastics-industry-plasti...
zzzeek 7y ago
agree, I'm pretty frustrated with the notion that end-consumers are entirely responsible for somehow reversing the trend of pollution by voluntarily opting out of the packaging system. Firstly, it is mostly impossible to do completely without enormous effort and sacrifice, secondly, only a tiny fraction of the population is actually going to attempt to do such a thing, and thirdly, as you said, manufacturers and industry will continue to produce and discard the majority of waste in any case. From a political point of view, putting the blame all on consumers is the perfect story for polluting industries to hide behind - "it's all your fault!". It's a scam, and only legislation and interruption at the supply chain will have any impact. The only genuinely good thing about consumers engaging in voluntary source reduction is that they raise their own political awareness, since the main thing they need to do is vote.

Joakal 7y ago

Speak to a supermarket owner/manager. You would not believe how much packaging exists for a simple apple or similar. You would see an unpackaged apple at the end of the process and be none the less aware about the plastics involved. Make sellers take back waste as a condition to sell. Boom. Problem solved.

salawat 7y ago
Careful! You've changed the incentive, but doubled the potential number of material transports needed to move packaging back to the source. In the interim period, while businesses figure out how to deal with less packaging, you end up with all the current stuff going back and forth all over the country, or you end up with attempts to set up a shadow infrastructure designed to ensure the right amount of packaging is in the right place at the right time to optimize on minimization of cost of the end product which is now priced with material handling in the equation. Instead of actually changing things the way you hoped, you may just reorganize the supply chain to a slightly more distributed model where packaging doesn't happen until the latest stage in the process. You've also invoked change in regulatory framework. Do we end up having to get FDA approval on alternate forms of food packaging or plasticless food transportation systems? Do the details of the implementation threaten some national security metric with regards to food availability? I'm mot saying I disagree with the intent at all, mind, but broad strokes without focusing on the nagging details have a way of coming back to haunt one in the long run. There are a lot of metrics and analysis that would need to be done before just declaring one day "Thou shalt!" Which is probably no less than what will be needed sadly.
- ericd 7y ago
  Well, presumably the truck needs to go back to the source, so they can bring back the old packaging on the return trip from bringing new goods to the store? I really wish Amazon would pay their delivery drivers to do this with used Amazon boxes, too.
  - salawat 7y ago
    Not necessarily. Truckers will often pick up entire new loads and chain deliveries depending on whether they're last mile/long haul/commodity/or specialized equipment haulers. So your packaging job would likely just be another blip on another trucker's route. But it would increase the need for more truckers since you're essentially (worst-case) doubling the number of deliveries to be done per transaction.

gbrown 7y ago

Sure, everyone should do their part. BUT: 1. Pretending that's a practical way to get the kind and scale of change we need is extremely wishful thinking, to the point that I wouldn't be shocked to see polluting industries promoting it to distract from regulatory solutions. 2. That attitude reflects your economic privilege. Not only is it harder for poor people to make these kinds of choices, living with a scarcity mindset makes you less likely to care and less able to act strategically. There must be collective action - must.

deleted 7y ago

[deleted]

deleted 7y ago

[deleted]

stjohnswarts 7y ago

You don't give any context for what "a load" is to you? 1 garbage bag? A pickup truck? a regular garbage truck?

anigbrowl 7y ago

Give me a break. I have been leading a low pollution lifestyle for decades and many consumers do too. Nobody likes waste except the people that make money from producing it. I am not throwing my hands up, I am saying it's time to attack the root of the problem instead of clipping the topiary into slightly better shape. Waiting for the market to just catch up is failing and discounts the influence of marketers and lobbyists, as well as discounting the possibility of collective action. Don't be a judas goat.

ericd 7y ago

From some of the other comments, sounds like we also need to throw away all our polyester fabric and stop using cars, as well.