I don't even follow the internal logic of that message. It's a reply to somebody applying a legal term and pointing out alleged specifics that seem to match wit

I don't even follow the internal logic of that message. It's a reply to somebody applying a legal term and pointing out alleged specifics that seem to match with it's definition. And his rebuttal is an outright refusal of two of the main criteria in the legal sense (IANAL but victim's age and location of the alleged crime seem to be pretty relevant), mixed with a switch to a "dispute" about the definition of another term that a bygone generation takes issue with.