14 ms·
> If you charge your visitors for the videos, you’ll have to pay royalty fines, but if you offer the video for free you won’t have to worry about that, ever. Ev
by haberman 16y ago
> If you charge your visitors for the videos, you’ll have to pay royalty fines, but if you offer the video for free you won’t have to worry about that, ever. Ever? Yes, ever.
The "Yes, ever." link points to to http://www.mpegla.com/Lists/MPEG%20LA%20News%20List/Attachments/226/n-10-02-02.pdf http://www.mpegla.com/Lists/MPEG%20LA%20News%20List/Attachme... , which says (emphasis mine):
"MPEG LA announced today that its AVC Patent Portfolio
License will continue not to charge royalties for Internet Video that is free to end users (known as Internet
Broadcast AVC Video) during the next License term from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015."
I don't see how "until the end of 2015" means "forever." It's also not clear whether this covers free software or just content publishers.
In other words, it looks exactly like the prelude to another GIF bait-and-switch.
- KuraFire 16y agoThere is a separate statement somewhere released by MPEG LA that extended that particular policy to “forever”, explicitly stating it would thus exceed the previous deadline of December 31, 2015. That applies only the two conditions outlined in the article _combined_ though.