4 ms·
So how do you justify to your family that you are voting for someone who will reduce availability of very specialized treatment for them (those boutique doctors
by dmitrygr 7y ago
So how do you justify to your family that you are voting for someone who will reduce availability of very specialized treatment for them (those boutique doctors), so some random people you've never heard of can have better care "on average"?
Becuase that's where I get stuck.
- omegaworks 7y agoSpecialized care is not synonymous with boutique care. We have a robust research and development economy in the US that will continue to exist without the perverse incentives of private insurance.
- dmitrygr 7y agoIs that why people from all over the world come to USA for cancer care, against all costs?
- omegaworks 7y agoAnd people all over the world go to South Korea for plastic surgery. We don’t stop being the best because we now pay for the care for every American at the point of need. Specialized illnesses don’t discriminate by class. Those without means don’t receive the care they need. We are fighting so that the system centers that care instead of revolving around a third party private payer that has every incentive to deny that care.
- rahidz 7y agoFrom a selfish perspective, because you run into those random people. When your servers and your retail employees can go to the doctor instead of "waiting it out" because of medical expenses, that's less likely to make you and your family ill. From a less selfish perspective, there but for the grace of God go you. Hoy por ti, mañana por mi.
- jellicle 7y agoHaving boutique practices is what reduces the availability of very specialized treatment, not the reverse. You're stuck because your understanding is completely backwards.