I repeat: if you have a point to make, prioritize it over pointing out my grammar or qualifying the way I present my comment. Really, say it because I have no

I repeat: if you have a point to make, prioritize it over pointing out my grammar or qualifying the way I present my comment. Really, say it because I have no idea what your position is and we have been communicating a bit at this point. You have repeated twice now that the government's bargaining power, is impaired. Yes, that's what I said in my parent comment 2 days ago. Why are you repeating what I said, to me? No, my previous comment was not ad hominem because I didn't know the position you were taking and I still dont know what position you have on the matter. I noticed tunnel vision on your part that was imparing the quality of the conversation and I suggested a technique I often follow myself. If you want to argue the semantics of an ad hominem, I am out of time. Is your point that the government's bargaining power, which is impaired, less than the bargaining power citizens like you and I possess? To clarify: My point, with the tenuous analogies included, is: the government's bargaining power, even after being severly impaired, is still superior to the bargaining power citizens like you and I possess when it comes to negotiating the prices of drugs that we need to get and be better. Other developed countries recognize this and exploit it to the benefit of their citizens. Perhaps we should think of something similar but outside government.