> You argue that this it is childish for us to force the issue. No, I don't argue that at all. I argue that it's childish to say China is forcing us to do this

> You argue that this it is childish for us to force the issue. No, I don't argue that at all. I argue that it's childish to say China is forcing us to do this. I also said it's foolish to only look at the cost of continuing to subsidize Chinese imports, and not ALSO look at the cost of leaving the global postal union. Your post shows that you continue to only look at the former costs, and have yet to even acknowledge that the latter has cost. Incidentally, looking at ALL the possible outcomes to choose your action is exactly what game theory about, so don't cite game theory as if it proves your point when in fact you're refusing to actually use game theory.