I don't think the article suggests dispensing with the threshold, it suggests mainly that the language used to treat p < 0.05 is disingenuous and should be reco

I don't think the article suggests dispensing with the threshold, it suggests mainly that the language used to treat p < 0.05 is disingenuous and should be reconsidered: "We conclude, based on our review of the articles in this special issue and the broader literature, that it is time to stop using the term “statistically significant” entirely."