what should they be correcting? Everyone who stayed with him since mid 2008 has lost 65% of their net worth they had in Clarium as of 2008. However, considerin

what should they be correcting? Everyone who stayed with him since mid 2008 has lost 65% of their net worth they had in Clarium as of 2008. However, considering that Clarium assets under management are down from about $8bn to about $2bn, that's only about 25% of investors since the peak (assuming everyone invested equal sums of money at the same point in time - most certainly not true). people should first learn to read financial journalism correctly before sending "corrections" back :)