The enforcer's problem is that they might inadvertently make it worthwhile for unfavorable things to happen to the enforcer, such as: - Making it more profitab

The enforcer's problem is that they might inadvertently make it worthwhile for unfavorable things to happen to the enforcer, such as: - Making it more profitable for the company to just leave your market completely, underservicing everyone there immediately - Creating an actual monopoly with costlier and poorer service when the policed company exits the market (either from leaving or being dissolved - the latter not applying to Google in this case) - Creating an incentive to actually challenge the authority in court. Exponentially raising the cost for enforcement and not guaranteeing any favorable outcome. - And as a corollary to the court, the challenge of authority can result in all the enforcement tools being declared invalid, including the charter for the enforcement agency itself! Resulting in a big public sector layoff and void in enforcement capability.