4 ms·
I don't think this is new or that unexpected, but it should be talked about. We use to breed plants based on both taste and size, taste being altered significan
by AngryData 7y ago
I don't think this is new or that unexpected, but it should be talked about. We use to breed plants based on both taste and size, taste being altered significantly by mineral contents. Currently, we mostly only breed plants based on weight, taste doesn't factor into it, and increasing sugars and starches increases weight far better than any mineral count. Heirloom plants are generally considered luxury products and since they don't have as large of yields, aren't a good competition against commercial plants, despite the fact that most people agree heirloom plants taste better and usually have higher mineral counts.
Now I don't know how much the the growing medium effects this, our topsoil is getting thinner and is fed primarily on 'purified' artificial fertilizers, and heirloom plants are far more likely to be home garden or 'organically' grown, but im willing to bet plant genetics play a much bigger role in mineral contents than anyone wants to admit. It would be another hit to the idea that current farming practices are sustainable long term and nobody wants to admit that.
- lightedman 7y ago"increasing sugars and starches increases weight far better than any mineral count" No, increasing bioavailable silica content (like potassium silicate addition) increases weight far more than any starch or sugar could possibly do.
- Merrill 7y agoPlants are also bred so that they can be picked before they are fully ripe and survive a multi-day trip to the grocery shelves of a supermarket. This may be less important for vegetables that go from field to cannery or freezers, so canned or frozen might be a better choice than fresh vegetables.