3 ms·
This problem effects a lot of other countries as well. For example Switzerland which is dealing with a huge amount of packages classified as mail but can't be r
by sschueller 7y ago
This problem effects a lot of other countries as well. For example Switzerland which is dealing with a huge amount of packages classified as mail but can't be run through automated sorting systems. Switzerland is putting the pressure on but it's a tiny country. The US jumping ship doesn't help anyone.
Switzerland is planning on charging receivers for the extra postage to make up for the huge losses until the postage union changes the rules. Why doesn't the US do something similar? They don't seem to have a problem applying tariffs on imports.
- AimForTheBushes 7y agoHonestly, I don't think band-aiding a broken system is the solution here. "Hoping for a better outcome later" is not what I want to see when we're directly subsidizing our biggest competitor, economically and democratically speaking.
- AnssiH 7y ago> Switzerland is planning on charging receivers for the extra postage to make up for the huge losses until the postage union changes the rules. I'd like to know more, do you have a source? Could not find via Google. Many postal services have a charge for customs clearance services, but I haven't heard of anyone charging extra postage yet. > Why doesn't the US do something similar? The U.S. STOP Act of 2018 established a fee of $1 for inbound EMS parcels starting in 2020 to cover customs processing costs. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr5788/summary https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr5788/summary But as noted, customs processing fee is a bit different from charging extra postage. And I believe small letter post items are the bigger issue, not EMS.