5 ms·
I understand that JS is required for most of the functionality but would be nice to also support non-JS by providing a basic uploader as a fallback. Other than
by outime 7y ago
I understand that JS is required for most of the functionality but would be nice to also support non-JS by providing a basic uploader as a fallback.
Other than that, it does look great!
Edit: Sorry for my brainfart - obviously my suggestion isn't that easy to do as commenters remind below. I forgot for a moment this was built on top of Vue.
- Flow 7y agoNot sure how a Vue.js app would work without any client-side Javascript enabled.
- dhritzkiv 7y agoIt could be accomplished by a Server-Side-Rendered version of the plugin: the server could populate a `<noscript>` tag with a simple file input which would get displayed for clients without JS enabled.
- Flow 7y agoYes, of course, but I was thinking of the rest of the Vue app. Much of the things you do in a Vue app probably will not translate well into a postback-emulated no script variant without extensive work.
- orf 7y agoIt's a vue plugin.
- techntoke 7y agoToo bad web standards went in the direction they did and we never got a simplified version of the web, but instead a bloated one that requires MB of JavaScript dependencies for dynamic applications.
- SergeAx 7y agoJS frameworks are not standards, they are just tools. You still can build plain HTML site, even without CSS, and it will work fine in any browser.
- techntoke 7y agoWhat I'm saying though is a lot of the functionality that is now required in non-standard JS frameworks, should have been included in an official spec that doesn't require JS. Like progress bars for instance.
- humble_engineer 7y agoYou're a bigot