Have you seen Stallman's homepage, particularly its glossary section? Look at his definition for "planet roasters" or "thug" or "bankster". He clearly is fine w

Have you seen Stallman's homepage, particularly its glossary section? Look at his definition for "planet roasters" or "thug" or "bankster". He clearly is fine with inflated rhetoric, and yet has the nerve to lecture the article author with this tripe: > Whatever conduct you want to criticize, you should describe it with a specific term that avoids moral vagueness about the nature of the criticism. (not that I think the author was even technically wrong to use the word "assaulting" for suspected statutory rape)