3 ms·
Maybe it's a regional way of saying "nuclear" but, given the highly negative context of actual nukes, I expected a fervently anti-nuclear article. It'd be l
by ad404b8a372f2b9 7y ago
Maybe it's a regional way of saying "nuclear" but, given the highly negative context of actual nukes, I expected a fervently anti-nuclear article.
It'd be like an article in support of euthanasia being titled: "This state wants both end of life care and murder".
- melling 7y agoNope. It’s commonly used. “No Nukes Is Bad News for Climate” https://www.wsj.com/articles/no-nukes-is-bad-news-for-climate-11568325259 https://www.wsj.com/articles/no-nukes-is-bad-news-for-climat... “How Old Nukes Can Help Green New Dealers” https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-09-10/elizabeth-warren-bernie-sanders-nuclear-energy-plans-clash https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-09-10/elizab... Any reasonable intelligence would have understood from the context. Would make a good test for anyone’s AI.