Absolutely, couldn't agree more. I just wanted to clarify why the bit-shifting approach was equivalent to the previous comment's multiplication by 36.4. > This

Absolutely, couldn't agree more. I just wanted to clarify why the bit-shifting approach was equivalent to the previous comment's multiplication by 36.4. > This is one of my favorite sites on the internet: https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html Yes - I also enjoyed the book "Hacker's Delight", but haven't got round to reading the second edition yet.