5 ms·
Your argument was that it's "impossible" to improve the state of the art due to existing patents. I explained that it's possible. Are we agreeing or have I miss
by jacques_chester 7y ago
Your argument was that it's "impossible" to improve the state of the art due to existing patents. I explained that it's possible. Are we agreeing or have I missed something?
- deogeo 7y agoMy argument was that while you can improve the state of the art, rarely do software patents incentivize you to do so.
- jacques_chester 7y agoWhy don't they?