4 ms·
I disagree that the "turning vehicle" scenarios represent false positives. The driver can't possibly know that there isn't e.g. a scooter in front of the turnin
by RyanCavanaugh 7y ago
I disagree that the "turning vehicle" scenarios represent false positives. The driver can't possibly know that there isn't e.g. a scooter in front of the turning vehicle. It isn't safe to drive full speed ahead with the assumption that once the turning vehicle is gone, there isn't another obstacle in front of it, and the EAB is correct to brake in these instances.
- cma 7y agoNot sure in those cases, but we make assumptions all the time based on not having seen a scooter previously, and assuming a scooter couldn’t have gotten into a car-occluded area without moving faster than X mph. Most AEB maybe doesn’t use long term temporal data to make decisions or trust its own non-observations as being definitive (it may assume there was a strong chance of a false negative in detecting a scooter in a previous frame too easily and not allow that non observation to rule it out in the current frame; it may also have enough of a false negative detection rate that what it is doing is rational).