I did not say I want illegal immigration to be legal. I agree with nemothekid’s other reply. As I said earlier, nothing exists in a vacuum. I am arguing that t

I did not say I want illegal immigration to be legal. I agree with nemothekid’s other reply. As I said earlier, nothing exists in a vacuum. I am arguing that the U.S. government’s immigration enforcement apparatus is consistently unjust. Saying, “Oh but that’s not what we’re talking about” saddens me. That is exactly what we are talking about, only looking ahead at a new way for injustice to occur. It is absolutely reasonable for you and I to consider who the people are who will be using this privacy-invasive technology. Increasingly, I am disappointed by the tech world’s lack of ethical awareness and foresight for these kinds of issues. The outcome won’t be “border += cool new virtual fence”. It will be “border += virtual fence” plus the bad side effects that come from making immigration enforcement more powerful, as I argued above. On the other hand, maybe all that ethical stuff is just B.S. and all actions should be taken without thinking of consequences or context. Indeed, the world is a bit like Haskell - all pure and no side effects! Just a promising startup with some kick-ass tech ready to disrupt shit!