4 ms·

> the Universe should be 50% matter and 50% antimatter Out of curiosity, where does this come from?

by copper 16y ago

InclinedPlane 16y ago
The big-bang did not create particles or atoms, merely energy. In the very initial stages of the big-bang all of the mass of the entire Universe was locked up in bosons (photons, W & Z bosons, etc.), with virtual quarks and other exotic particles existing only ephemerally. At this stage the Universe is essentially an enormously hot photon gas. As the Universe cooled lower energy particles (such as electrons and protons) became more stable, and more and more energy started to become locked up in them. Interactions involving high energy photons can create particle / anti-particle pairs, in theory these should be exactly balanced. However, in practice it appears as though there is much more matter than anti-matter in the Universe. Likely this is due to some slight imbalance in particle/anti-particle pair creation, but we do not sufficiently understand this (though there have been a few hints).
Panoramix 16y ago
I think that's a good question. It is natural to require that the total charge in the universe was zero at the start of its life (same goes for all quantum numbers). Otherwise, there was something before there was anything! Seriously, either this matter-antimatter asymmetry was an initial condition (in which case we can't hope to understand it) or it appeared at some point during the course of things. The problem of finding the exact mechanism that gave us the matter-filled universe we observe today, with all the antimatter gone is an open question. There are a bunch of hypotheses, and experiments coming son to a large hadron collider near you will help physicists gather pieces of the puzzle.
- copper 16y ago
  Thanks (both you and InclinedPlane), I guess that makes sense. I thought there were some theories that early-universe physics were very different from what they are now, though I'm not sure how that would help.

> the Universe should be 50% matter and 50% antimatter Out of curiosity, where does this come from?

by copper 16y ago

> the Universe should be 50% matter and 50% antimatter Out of curiosity, where does this come from?

The big-bang did not create particles or atoms, merely energy. In the very initial stages of the big-bang all of the mass of the entire Universe was locked up in bosons (photons, W & Z bosons, etc.), with virtual quarks and other exotic particles existing only ephemerally. At this stage the Universe is essentially an enormously hot photon gas. As the Universe cooled lower energy particles (such as electrons and protons) became more stable, and more and more energy started to become locked up in them. Interactions involving high energy photons can create particle / anti-particle pairs, in theory these should be exactly balanced. However, in practice it appears as though there is much more matter than anti-matter in the Universe. Likely this is due to some slight imbalance in particle/anti-particle pair creation, but we do not sufficiently understand this (though there have been a few hints).

Panoramix 16y ago

I think that's a good question. It is natural to require that the total charge in the universe was zero at the start of its life (same goes for all quantum numbers). Otherwise, there was something before there was anything! Seriously, either this matter-antimatter asymmetry was an initial condition (in which case we can't hope to understand it) or it appeared at some point during the course of things. The problem of finding the exact mechanism that gave us the matter-filled universe we observe today, with all the antimatter gone is an open question. There are a bunch of hypotheses, and experiments coming son to a large hadron collider near you will help physicists gather pieces of the puzzle.

copper 16y ago
Thanks (both you and InclinedPlane), I guess that makes sense. I thought there were some theories that early-universe physics were very different from what they are now, though I'm not sure how that would help.