3 ms·
I'm with tshannon, unsarcastically. It might even mean better for people morally, without affecting the person physically at all.
by sp332 7y ago
I'm with tshannon, unsarcastically. It might even mean better for people morally, without affecting the person physically at all.
- adambard 7y ago"Better, for people!"
- donatj 7y agoMy point though is, if that is what they meant, there is an obvious difference between what was said and what they mean in normal interpretations, and I'm almost inclined to believe it's purposefully deceptive. There are much clearer ways to state that, like "better for the environment".
- sp332 7y agoYeah it's extremely weaselly no matter what. It doesn't make any particular health claims, plus it says they "looked for" such ingredients and does not claim that they found them or used them.