5 ms·

Yeah "Better for people" could mean that it's better for people's environment due to lower greenhouse gas emissions.

donatj 7y ago
Poe's law in full effect, I'm genuinely unsure if this is a joke. "Better for people" reads to every layperson as "good for you".
- AndrewBissell 7y ago
  To Serve Man
- sp332 7y ago
  I'm with tshannon, unsarcastically. It might even mean better for people morally, without affecting the person physically at all.
  - adambard 7y ago
    "Better, for people!"
  - donatj 7y ago
    My point though is, if that is what they meant, there is an obvious difference between what was said and what they mean in normal interpretations, and I'm almost inclined to believe it's purposefully deceptive. There are much clearer ways to state that, like "better for the environment".
    - sp332 7y ago
      Yeah it's extremely weaselly no matter what. It doesn't make any particular health claims, plus it says they "looked for" such ingredients and does not claim that they found them or used them.
- cortesoft 7y ago
  Does it, though? I would assume they would say "Better for you" if they meant it was healthier, and "Better for people" if they meant it was better for humanity as a whole. I guess it could be read either way, though. edit: although looking at the actual pdf, it says "better for people and the environment", which hurts my interpretation of the wording.
- williamstein 7y ago
  Also Beyond meat's main product page (https://www.beyondmeat.com/products/ https://www.beyondmeat.com/products/) literally says "better for you": "Imagine your favorite meaty dishes like burgers and tacos delivering the juicy, delicious taste you know and love, while being better for you [...]".
awinder 7y ago
It says "Improving Human Health" in the leftmost graphic on https://www.beyondmeat.com/about/ https://www.beyondmeat.com/about/, and they list specific medical ailments under that. Only a lawyer could try to make the argument these weren't pitched as better health options than burgers, and even then, I would not want to be that lawyer.
deleted 7y ago
[deleted]

Poe's law in full effect, I'm genuinely unsure if this is a joke. "Better for people" reads to every layperson as "good for you".

AndrewBissell 7y ago
To Serve Man
sp332 7y ago
I'm with tshannon, unsarcastically. It might even mean better for people morally, without affecting the person physically at all.
- adambard 7y ago
  "Better, for people!"
- donatj 7y ago
  My point though is, if that is what they meant, there is an obvious difference between what was said and what they mean in normal interpretations, and I'm almost inclined to believe it's purposefully deceptive. There are much clearer ways to state that, like "better for the environment".
  - sp332 7y ago
    Yeah it's extremely weaselly no matter what. It doesn't make any particular health claims, plus it says they "looked for" such ingredients and does not claim that they found them or used them.
cortesoft 7y ago
Does it, though? I would assume they would say "Better for you" if they meant it was healthier, and "Better for people" if they meant it was better for humanity as a whole. I guess it could be read either way, though. edit: although looking at the actual pdf, it says "better for people and the environment", which hurts my interpretation of the wording.
williamstein 7y ago
Also Beyond meat's main product page (https://www.beyondmeat.com/products/ https://www.beyondmeat.com/products/) literally says "better for you": "Imagine your favorite meaty dishes like burgers and tacos delivering the juicy, delicious taste you know and love, while being better for you [...]".

awinder 7y ago

It says "Improving Human Health" in the leftmost graphic on https://www.beyondmeat.com/about/ https://www.beyondmeat.com/about/, and they list specific medical ailments under that. Only a lawyer could try to make the argument these weren't pitched as better health options than burgers, and even then, I would not want to be that lawyer.

deleted 7y ago

[deleted]