3 ms·

I created an ansible role that does this for me: https://github.com/sumdog/bee2/blob/master/ansible/roles/docker/tasks/servertls.yml https://github.com/sumdog/

I created an ansible role that does this for me: https://github.com/sumdog/bee2/blob/master/ansible/roles/docker/tasks/servertls.yml https://github.com/sumdog/bee2/blob/master/ansible/roles/doc... It creates client certs and copies them locally too, so I can connect to Docker remotely over a VPN. Still this doesn't solve the original problem I talked about. It's not about securely connecting to the daemon. Even if you connect securely, you still essentially have root access on the host machine. I've considered writing a proxy that restricts what commands can be forwarded on to the Docker host socket (e.g. allowing for container IPs x,y and z to restart containers, but not to create new ones or pull images). There doesn't seem to be fine grained security or roles built into the docker daemon itself. Running docker in a docker container would give you a throw-away docker to use for things like Jenkins, Gitlab-CI, and other build tools without giving it access directly to root on the host.

imiric 7y ago
> Even if you connect securely, you still essentially have root access on the host machine. Your original point was about the pain of sharing the Unix socket to control other containers, so that's why I brought up the API approach. It's been a while since I used Docker, but have you tried enabling user namespace remapping[1]? I remember it working as documented, and don't see why it wouldn't work remotely or DiD. There's also experimental rootless support since 19.03[2], maybe give that a try. Other than that, make sure you trust the images you run, or preferably, inspect every Dockerfile, ensure that the process runs as an unprivileged user, and build everything from scratch yourself. I agree with you that this is a major security issue, but we've known that since its introduction, and things seem to be improving, albeit slowly. Thankfully, nowadays there is other OCI-compatible tooling you can use and sidestep Docker altogether. Podman[3] is growing on me, mostly because of rootless support, though it's not without its issues and limitations. [1]: https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/userns-remap/ https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/userns-remap/ [2]: https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/docs/rootless.md https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/docs/rootless.md [3]: https://podman.io/ https://podman.io/

imiric 7y ago

> Even if you connect securely, you still essentially have root access on the host machine. Your original point was about the pain of sharing the Unix socket to control other containers, so that's why I brought up the API approach. It's been a while since I used Docker, but have you tried enabling user namespace remapping[1]? I remember it working as documented, and don't see why it wouldn't work remotely or DiD. There's also experimental rootless support since 19.03[2], maybe give that a try. Other than that, make sure you trust the images you run, or preferably, inspect every Dockerfile, ensure that the process runs as an unprivileged user, and build everything from scratch yourself. I agree with you that this is a major security issue, but we've known that since its introduction, and things seem to be improving, albeit slowly. Thankfully, nowadays there is other OCI-compatible tooling you can use and sidestep Docker altogether. Podman[3] is growing on me, mostly because of rootless support, though it's not without its issues and limitations. [1]: https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/userns-remap/ https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/userns-remap/ [2]: https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/docs/rootless.md https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/docs/rootless.md [3]: https://podman.io/ https://podman.io/