> The cost of legislating net neutrality is quite low and the consequences of cartel pricing are quite damaging. Therefore it makes sense to regulate now rather

> The cost of legislating net neutrality is quite low and the consequences of cartel pricing are quite damaging. Therefore it makes sense to regulate now rather than later. How about some supporting evidence? For example, is it necessarily true that regulation now will be benign to good as opposed to extremely harmful? Or, are you suggesting that this is a case that govt will do well? If so, why?