3 ms·
Try embedding Base64 images in the email instead: <img src="...=">
by claar 7y ago
Try embedding Base64 images in the email instead:
<img src="...=">
- jraph 7y agoThat's what the LaTeX It! Thunderbird add-on [1] does I think. Good extension by the way. Not sure it will work with Thunderbird 68, I didn't check. [1] https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/addon/latex-it/ https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/addon/latex...
- londons_explore 7y agoInline base64 shouldn't have any head of line blocking or slow rendering issues, unlike embedded images-as-mime-attachments, which will normally result in one HTTP request to gmails servers per image, and without QUIC you'll get head of line blocking and limited/no HTTP pipelining making that very slow. Inline base64 should perform fine for small images up to ~10k images I'd guess on most hardware. If your email contains more than 10k math equations, perhaps email isn't the right tool...