3 ms·
well all those courses that aren't comp sci are still part of a degree, still require learning skills and still promote university-level thinking and production
by track_me_now 7y ago
well all those courses that aren't comp sci are still part of a degree, still require learning skills and still promote university-level thinking and production.
I think bootcamps actually demand a far higher rate of output and often at a very high level within specializations. The problem is I don't want to hire someone who can crank out bleeding edge framework code 20 hrs/day for 6 months.
- austenallred 7y agoAs someone who dropped out of college after the first two years (before specializing in a degree), I'm not sure "university-level thinking and production" is actually meaningful.
- barry-cotter 7y agoIt isn’t. It’s like transfer learning generally, despite decades of research trying to find it there’s no real evidence for it. Learning Latin barely makes you better at learning Italian, never mind reasoning. People learn what they’ve been taught and overwhelmingly don’t generalize. University level work in physics, literature and chemistry are so different as to have basically no overlap. University level is as meaningful as high school level in a world where Calclulus II tells you the course covered calculus and is otherwise uninformative.
- username90 7y agoPhysics and chemistry has plenty of overlap, you even have physical chemistry and chemical physics.
- zeppelin101 7y agoFrom what I've seen, most people treat the university as a prerequisite to getting a decent job. Only a very small percentage actually treat all classes in a serious way. Most just skate by in a majority of classes that they deem to be filler.