>The "people could die" argument is very weak and I would assume it to always be a self-serving assertion by government or the intelligence community. until of

>The "people could die" argument is very weak and I would assume it to always be a self-serving assertion by government or the intelligence community. until of course it is the government itself who discloses the sensitive info - in such cases even that weak argument is just thrown out the window like in the cases of Scooter Libby/Valerie Plame or Trump/Oleg Smolenkov.