3 ms·
Making people pay for security would be bad. A solution to this is having an upstream kernel (like mainline Linux) work on the phone, and having fairly standar
by jraph 7y ago
Making people pay for security would be bad.
A solution to this is having an upstream kernel (like mainline Linux) work on the phone, and having fairly standard hardware in the phone with in-kernel drivers and free / standard libraries instead of these shitty blobs we need on current phones, and crappy unmaintainable Linux forks.
Android 9 works on my nine year old airis kira slimpad x86 tablet sold with Windows 7. It runs a standard Xubuntu though. And yes, the latest Ubuntu with latest security patches.
I don't rely on the manufacturer. It just works with standard software. Have the OS builders and hardware device makers maintain each part for you.
This is not the world we live in though. In our world, Qualcomm and Samsung make their messy Linux forks and don't seem to maintain their Shit on a Chip.
The Librem 5 is promising on this matter though.
- freehunter 7y agoMaking people pay for security isn't unusual. Windows XP is still supported by Microsoft... provided you're willing to pay extra for it.
- jraph 7y agoOh, yeah, absolutely. I can see a corporation / organization pay for Windows XP security updates. Regular people, not so much.