3 ms·
Going by that standard, 95% of all Russian peasant farmers are "Russian Agents" and that's pure ridiculousness from any angle.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Going by that standard, 95% of all Russian peasant farmers are "Russian Agents" and that's pure ridiculousness from any angle.
- EpicEng 7y ago>Going by that standard, 95% of all Russian peasant farmers are "Russian Agents" and that's pure ridiculousness from any angle. Oh please, you're the one being ridiculous. I think we all know there's a line between farming for the good of civilization and actively working to push an agenda. C'mon.
- not_a_cop75 7y agoI suppose that all the South African farmers that moved to Russia to avoid getting killed over politics by savages are also Russian Agents. https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/land-expropriation-russia-sa-white-farmers/ https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/land-expropriation-russ...
- EpicEng 7y agoIf the subsequently worked at the behest of the Russian goverment to push their agenda, yes. Honestly are you even reading what I'm typing?
- not_a_cop75 7y agoWell, then I suppose it was indeed a PR stunt for the Russians to accept South African farmers, and they are according to your logic indeed Russian Agents! That is assuming a PR campaign pushes an agenda, and I would argue it does.
- EpicEng 7y agoThere is a difference between and unwitting pawn, especially in a circumstance like that, and someone who acts with full knowledge as to what they're doing. I don't understand why this is difficult.
- not_a_cop75 7y agoIt's never an either/or. you're presenting a false dilemma.