The point of the article is that not eating meat have a lower effect on global warming than what mass media is shouting. IMO limiting meat consumption is a goo

The point of the article is that not eating meat have a lower effect on global warming than what mass media is shouting. IMO limiting meat consumption is a good idea, and not only on a global warming standpoint. However, I would say that a critique of the mass media communication on veganism is interesting. Is the effort proportional to the effect ? Are there not more efficient ways to fight climate change ? A writing that brings arguments - and data - against the hype is always interesting and refreshing to me. In 2000’s it was «go vegan» publication, today its «anti-vegan». To conclude, I’d say that every effort is counting to fight global warming, and the article is not against that idea.